NEWS
2020-06-15
As with front panel optical connections, OBO (On Board Optic) modules are easily interfaced to optical
backplane connectors through standard multi-fiber round jacketed cables, ribbon fiber or pre-shaped routed
ribbon fiber technology attached to OBO modules.
Optical FlexPlane can also be utilized with optical backplane specific connection elements on one end of the
FlexPlane and OBOs attached on the other. In this manner very dense and highly complex fiber port mapping
can be accomplished within the system elements. Hardware designers and system architects are attracted to
these interface technologies for a variety of aspects:
• Freeing up front panel space for increased airflow and client or networking ports
• Enabling faster system deployments, upgrades and repairs by eliminating manual installation of front
panel cabling connections
• Increasing interconnect density and easing cable management beyond traditional front panel optical
connectors and transceivers
• Allowing for greater modularization of system components via built in system specific connectivity
configurations such as optical shuffling which standardizes line cards and drawers thus enabling use
of standard structured cabling external to the chassis
Types of Optical Backplane Connectors
Ceramic
ferrule based optical backplane connectors were first to market decades ago and
for the most part based on industry standard connectors for the user side such
as the MU, SC and LC along with custom termini based versions for vendor specific
applications. Ceramic single fiber ferrule interconnects utilize a cylindrical
ferrule on each side of the interface aligned within a ceramic split
sleeve held in a mating housing normally mounted on the
backplane. The board side of the interface is a customized housing mounted to
the PCB holding the ferrules designed for proper mating alignment into the
backplane housing.
Optical performance and density mimic the standards-based connector with additional dimensional overhead for latching and mounting features. Port counts typically range from 2 to 8 connectors utilizing either 1.25 or 2.50mm ferrules. Cleaning and inspection is more standardized and well supported due to wide adoption of the standardsbased connectors. Today the LC blind mating interface is most predominant in 2, 4, and 8 port counts supporting multimode and single mode fiber.
Multi-fiber MT ferrule based optical backplane interfaces are most common and achieve vastly higher fiber density than ceramic single fiber ferrules by incorporating multiple fibers per ferrule and multiple ferrule ports per connector. Port counts typically range from one 1 to 8 MT type ferrules enabling up to 384 fibers per connector in a 16x55mm area when using 48 fiber ferrules. These interfaces are available from several manufacturers in a number of configurations and mounting styles addressing card cage styles and system specific mechanical and packaging needs.
MT type ferrules utilize precision molded polymer ferrules aligned via
metal guide pins in a male/female configuration. Their incorporation within an
optical backplane connector housing requires detailed consideration for
mechanical alignment and containment for proper operation.
Optical Backplane Connector Mechanical Overview
Self-latching optical backplane connectors offer additional Z
axis travel or float easing card to
Optical backplane connectors are typically mounted to a back
panel which has cut-outs for the connector to mount within letting the fibers
pass through to the backside of the chassis. As with electrical backplane connectors
there are versions of optical backplane connectors supporting coplanar,
orthogonal and standard card cage designs as well as newer rack scale drawers/sled
architectures all having unique mounting methods and mechanical requirements.
Mounting methods include screws, rivets, clips or snap fits and require
mechanical float of the connector housing to accommodate mating tolerances of
the card or drawer assembly to the backplane / chassis.
One unique aspect to optical backplane connectors is there are
very few industry standards driving
Cleaning and Inspection
Future Needs and Challenges
Early
engagement between system architects and optical backplane connector engineers
is critical as needs of the system architecture, mechanical enclosure,
connector interface and system fiber connectivity scheme are tightly coupled.
The number of fibers connected throughout the system can be immense numbering
in the thousands making for a complex set of mechanical, optical device, cable
management, thermal and usage needs. It is nearly impossible to add optical
backplane connectors to a system design after the fact or to even change across
different types of interfaces due to mechanical mounting, card pitch and
chassis design requirements. One aspect that is very flexible is fiber count
per connector due to the many options available in multi-fiber MT ferrules and
optical connectors supporting multiple MT ferrule ports. The trade-off becomes
optical performance which decreases with an increase in the number of fibers per
ferrule and fiber management where a single optical backplane connector can
have hundreds of fiber connections.
Mechanical design and mounting needs of optical backplane
connectors greatly influences chassis
design due to mating geometries and nuances in latching
and holding force required dependant on
the type of connector. As ferrules are individually spring
loaded, these forces must either be accounted for in the optical backplane
connector or card front panel latches. Spring forces per MT ferrule ranging from
10N for 12 fiber ferules to 20N for 24+ fibers per ferrule is multiplied for
each ferrule port of the connector. Considering an optical backplane connector
with eight 24 fiber MT ferrule ports and 4 connectors per card builds up to a
required holding force of 640N per card. Optical backplane connectors come in
two types, self-latching or nonlatching, which in the case of the latter card
latches and chassis/backplane structure must compress the ferrule springs and
hold the cards and connectors in a mated condition.
backplane design tolerances. The trade-off between the two versions is somewhat
dependent on individual connector design and affects density, connector complexity
and cost as latches add additional size, design complexity and component count.
This is one of the reasons expanded beam and alternate ferrule interfaces are
attractive as they greatly reduce spring forces required to hold the ferrules
in contact often by a factor of 5 to 10x less force independent of fiber count.
If mechanical tolerances of the card cage or rack are not within a range
supported by the connector, guide pins are often utilized to increase mating
precision. Because optical connectors are typically longer or first to mate in
the mating sequence, electrical connectors cannot be utilized as guidance
features. AAdditionally, board mounted electrical connectors have no float
therefore the optical connector must have float to eliminate binding of the
multiple interfaces. These aspects must be carefully considered by mechanical
designers and considered in connector selection.
Testing and qualification criteria for mechanical and environmental performance
is established
within Telcordia GR-1435-CORE covering multi-fiber connectors. Durability and
performance of these connectors is primarily governed by the ferrule performance
where optimal optical performance can be maintained well over the defined 50
mating cycle requirements. System specific mechanical and cable management
validation is key throughout the development process.
harmonization or interoperability across vendors. Limited standardization
efforts primarily within VITA and ARINC organizations focused mainly on rugged and
aerospace applications with a few vendors being interoperable but not
harmonized fully in design. Across optical backplane connector manufacturers design
approaches taken to protect and secure ferrules on the cable and within
connector housings differs greatly with each trying to achieve a tradeoff
between density, robustness and usability. Some low-density versions utilize
industry standard MPO/MTP connectors as the mating interface while most use
proprietary clips and connectors making vendor interoperability non-existent.
For system designers and users, it is important to understand
how optical ferrules are held within mounting clips, their installation and
removal process from the main connector housing during manufacturing and maintenance
and how potential inspection or cleaning processes will be implemented in the
intended system.
Alternative multi-fiber ferrule solutions are in development to address end
user robustness and
usability aspects with a goal of reducing total cost of ownership. These
ferrules also provide benefits as to reduced sensitivity to dust / debris,
lower spring forces, different mechanical mating and alignment benefits. As
with any physical mating interface maintaining cleanliness for unabated fiber to
fiber contact at the ferrule surface is critical to optical performance and
preventing fiber surface damage. This is especially critical in optical
backplane connectors where access to the ferrule interface for cleaning and
inspection is more difficult. Ferrule and fiber debris drive interest to
ferrule interfaces that do not require fiber to fiber physical mating such as
expanded beam and fiber gap ferrules. When alternative multi-fiber ferrules are
based on the industry standard MT ferrule footprint they can be implemented in
any MT ferrule-based backplane connector broadening the connectors application space
and reducing total cost of ownership.
As
optical backplane connectors are often seated deep within a chassis or rack or on narrowly spaced cards, inspection and cleaning aspects of fiber optic
interfaces are greatly aggravated due to restricted access to the interfaces.
Additionally, safety shutters are a method often utilized on optical backplane
connectors to keep ferrule interfaces protected and while helpful for eye safety,
complete dust prevention is often not possible making cleaning and inspection
products necessary accessories to be considered for factory and field usage. Cleaning
and inspection apparatus available from industry suppliers can be implemented
with connector specific fixtures on system dummy cards properly mounted and
positioned for the specific chassis and optical backplane connector
implementation. Due to these complexities much care is taken to ship system elements
with factory inspected, cleaned and protected interfaces enabling first time
installed system bring up rates to very high levels where long-term repair and inspection
takes more effort. These challenges are strong drivers to increased interest in
expanded beam and alternate ferrule technologies (e.g. air gap) as they ease
many aspects of inspection, cleaning and end user cost of ownership.
Roadmaps
for optical backplane connectors should include several aspects:
• Versions supporting new application such as rack
scale architectures incorporating greater mechanical tolerances and robustness
for large heavy drawers and / or sleds
• Versions with lower mating forces per ferrule or fiber for economical card and backplane designs
• Incorporation of alternative multi-fiber ferrule technologies
easing deployments and usage while reducing cleaning and inspection burdens
thus reducing total cost of ownership
• Improvements in cleaning and inspection technologies
• Support for new fiber types to increase density, reduce
fiber bulk
• Potential standardization efforts providing supply side
security and increasing volumes through wider adoption